<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (11) TMI 246 - COMPANY LAW BOARD NORTHERN REGION BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199481</link>
    <description>Strict compliance with the mandatory transfer formalities under Section 108 of the Companies Act, 1956 was required, and the company was not justified in registering the transfer of 50 equity shares because the instrument was not duly stamped in the manner required at the time of transfer. However, rectification of the register of members was not ordered because the transferee and other affected parties were not all before the authority, and further transfers had occurred, preventing a final determination of title against absent parties. The petitioner was left at liberty to implead all necessary parties and seek appropriate relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 14:31:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (11) TMI 246 - COMPANY LAW BOARD NORTHERN REGION BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199481</link>
      <description>Strict compliance with the mandatory transfer formalities under Section 108 of the Companies Act, 1956 was required, and the company was not justified in registering the transfer of 50 equity shares because the instrument was not duly stamped in the manner required at the time of transfer. However, rectification of the register of members was not ordered because the transferee and other affected parties were not all before the authority, and further transfers had occurred, preventing a final determination of title against absent parties. The petitioner was left at liberty to implead all necessary parties and seek appropriate relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>