<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1325 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199475</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remitted the matter back to the AO for reevaluation, considering the unique circumstances of the year under consideration. The appeal of the assessee was treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:04:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1325 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199475</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remitted the matter back to the AO for reevaluation, considering the unique circumstances of the year under consideration. The appeal of the assessee was treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>