<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 62 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12097</link>
    <description>Section 2(47)(v) applies to a development agreement only where the contract, read as a whole, effectively transfers possession or complete control in part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Mere substantial compliance, partial permissions, or payment of a substantial part of consideration are not enough by themselves. On the stated facts, the agreement contemplated further stages and did not justify treating the transfer as complete in assessment year 1996-97 for capital gains purposes. The factual basis for the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was also undermined by reliance on mistaken chronology and irrelevant material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 62 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12097</link>
      <description>Section 2(47)(v) applies to a development agreement only where the contract, read as a whole, effectively transfers possession or complete control in part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Mere substantial compliance, partial permissions, or payment of a substantial part of consideration are not enough by themselves. On the stated facts, the agreement contemplated further stages and did not justify treating the transfer as complete in assessment year 1996-97 for capital gains purposes. The factual basis for the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was also undermined by reliance on mistaken chronology and irrelevant material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>