<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 29 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12096</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, deciding that annuities purchased by the assessee should be included in the net wealth. However, the assessee was granted the chance to utilize the benefit of section 5(1)(vi) to determine the extent of exemption applicable to the annuities. The case was remanded to the Tribunal for computation of this exemption under the specified section of the Wealth-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 29 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12096</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, deciding that annuities purchased by the assessee should be included in the net wealth. However, the assessee was granted the chance to utilize the benefit of section 5(1)(vi) to determine the extent of exemption applicable to the annuities. The case was remanded to the Tribunal for computation of this exemption under the specified section of the Wealth-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>