https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199469 Service by affixture in execution proceedings was treated as effective only on strict compliance with Order V, Rule 19 CPC, including verification of the return by affidavit or examination of the serving officer on oath. The Court also treated the requirement of an express declaration of due service as mandatory, holding that silence or a mechanical endorsement was insufficient where the consequence was to bind the judgment-debtor to the shorter limitation period for challenging the execution sale. Strict observance of these safeguards was necessary before constructive notice and limitation consequences could follow, and the sale was therefore liable to be set aside. en-us Fri, 20 Jun 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Mar 2018 11:40:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199469 Service by affixture in execution proceedings was treated as effective only on strict compliance with Order V, Rule 19 CPC, including verification of the return by affidavit or examination of the serving officer on oath. The Court also treated the requirement of an express declaration of due service as mandatory, holding that silence or a mechanical endorsement was insufficient where the consequence was to bind the judgment-debtor to the shorter limitation period for challenging the execution sale. Strict observance of these safeguards was necessary before constructive notice and limitation consequences could follow, and the sale was therefore liable to be set aside. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 20 Jun 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199469