https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199468 In a public-bus-stand seizure treated as one under Section 43 of the NDPS Act, the Section 50 safeguard was held not to apply in the same manner unless the person concerned requested search before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, so the challenge on that ground failed. The evidence also established that the bag containing ganja was in the accused's possession, the contraband was proved by analysis, and the sampling and seizure process was duly proved. On that basis, the conviction under Section 20(b)(i) and the sentence were sustained. en-us Wed, 30 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Mar 2018 11:08:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199468 In a public-bus-stand seizure treated as one under Section 43 of the NDPS Act, the Section 50 safeguard was held not to apply in the same manner unless the person concerned requested search before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, so the challenge on that ground failed. The evidence also established that the bag containing ganja was in the accused's possession, the contraband was proved by analysis, and the sampling and seizure process was duly proved. On that basis, the conviction under Section 20(b)(i) and the sentence were sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199468