https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199466 Where a contract requires disputes to be resolved under the Rules of Arbitration of the Indian Council of Arbitration, the parties must first follow that agreed appointment procedure. Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be invoked straightaway unless the statutory contingencies for court intervention under Section 11(6) are shown to exist. Because the applicant bypassed the contractual arbitral mechanism and directly sought appointment of an arbitrator, the application was not maintainable and the designated court lacked authority to make the appointment; the appointment order was unsustainable. en-us Tue, 08 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Mar 2018 10:52:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199466 Where a contract requires disputes to be resolved under the Rules of Arbitration of the Indian Council of Arbitration, the parties must first follow that agreed appointment procedure. Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be invoked straightaway unless the statutory contingencies for court intervention under Section 11(6) are shown to exist. Because the applicant bypassed the contractual arbitral mechanism and directly sought appointment of an arbitrator, the application was not maintainable and the designated court lacked authority to make the appointment; the appointment order was unsustainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 08 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199466