<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1140 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the reopening of the assessment was invalid due to the lapse of four years and the full disclosure of material facts by the assessee. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 07:41:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1140 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the reopening of the assessment was invalid due to the lapse of four years and the full disclosure of material facts by the assessee. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>