<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 55 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356352</link>
    <description>The court set aside the assessment order dated 30.03.2006 and remitted the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The respondent was directed to furnish all copies of the seized documents to the petitioner and provide an opportunity for cross-examination. The court allowed the Writ Petition with no costs, ensuring that the assessment would be redone following the principles of natural justice and the ITAT&#039;s directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 07:41:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 55 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356352</link>
      <description>The court set aside the assessment order dated 30.03.2006 and remitted the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The respondent was directed to furnish all copies of the seized documents to the petitioner and provide an opportunity for cross-examination. The court allowed the Writ Petition with no costs, ensuring that the assessment would be redone following the principles of natural justice and the ITAT&#039;s directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>