https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356349 The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to exclude specified amounts as sales and fictitious income but emphasized the need for further assessment by the assessing officer to determine the quantum of inflated income for the residual period not covered by the special audit. The Court set aside the impugned decision and remanded the matter for detailed examination. en-us Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Mar 2018 10:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356349 The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to exclude specified amounts as sales and fictitious income but emphasized the need for further assessment by the assessing officer to determine the quantum of inflated income for the residual period not covered by the special audit. The Court set aside the impugned decision and remanded the matter for detailed examination. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356349