<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 49 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356346</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of complying with legal requirements in penalty proceedings. The penalty notice&#039;s failure to specify the charge under section 271(1)(c) rendered the penalty order invalid, resulting in its deletion. The Tribunal&#039;s decision highlighted the significance of proper notice in penalty imposition under the Income Tax Act, ultimately favoring the appellant in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 07:41:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 49 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356346</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of complying with legal requirements in penalty proceedings. The penalty notice&#039;s failure to specify the charge under section 271(1)(c) rendered the penalty order invalid, resulting in its deletion. The Tribunal&#039;s decision highlighted the significance of proper notice in penalty imposition under the Income Tax Act, ultimately favoring the appellant in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>