<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 45 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356342</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh consideration. The AO was directed to conduct further inquiries by summoning the companies controlled by Shri Praveen Kumar Jain and referring to actions taken by the Finance Ministry regarding such companies. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with instructions for the AO to provide the assessee with a fair opportunity to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 08:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 45 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356342</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh consideration. The AO was directed to conduct further inquiries by summoning the companies controlled by Shri Praveen Kumar Jain and referring to actions taken by the Finance Ministry regarding such companies. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with instructions for the AO to provide the assessee with a fair opportunity to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>