<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 16 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356313</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal. It concluded that the deduction from transaction value should align with the actual CST paid at the partially exempted rate, in accordance with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation. The Tribunal differentiated the case from previous decisions, emphasizing the restricted deductibility of VAT at the exempted rate for assessable value calculation under Section 4(3)(d) of the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 16 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356313</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal. It concluded that the deduction from transaction value should align with the actual CST paid at the partially exempted rate, in accordance with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation. The Tribunal differentiated the case from previous decisions, emphasizing the restricted deductibility of VAT at the exempted rate for assessable value calculation under Section 4(3)(d) of the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>