https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356299 The High Court dismissed the writ petition, advising the petitioner to seek relief from the Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority (CSTAA) instead of prematurely invoking Article 226 jurisdiction. The Court directed the petitioner to address pending appeal and stay application matters with the CSTAA to prevent multiple proceedings due to reassessment by the Commercial Tax Department. Temporary relief was granted, with instructions for the Deputy Commissioner to refrain from further actions pending CSTAA orders, emphasizing adherence to the established appellate process and avoiding premature recourse to extraordinary jurisdiction. en-us Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Mar 2018 07:36:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356299 The High Court dismissed the writ petition, advising the petitioner to seek relief from the Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority (CSTAA) instead of prematurely invoking Article 226 jurisdiction. The Court directed the petitioner to address pending appeal and stay application matters with the CSTAA to prevent multiple proceedings due to reassessment by the Commercial Tax Department. Temporary relief was granted, with instructions for the Deputy Commissioner to refrain from further actions pending CSTAA orders, emphasizing adherence to the established appellate process and avoiding premature recourse to extraordinary jurisdiction. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356299