https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199450 In motor accident compensation claims proceeded with under summary procedure, the opposite parties retain the right to cross-examine claimants when the asserted injuries, treatment and expenses are disputed. Summary procedure does not remove the Tribunal's power to test the truth of affidavit evidence through cross-examination. Where claimants were given opportunities to appear, including after a later request was allowed, but still failed to remain present, the Tribunal could treat the pleaded facts as unproved. On that basis, the claims were dismissed, and no interference was warranted. en-us Wed, 17 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:55:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199450 In motor accident compensation claims proceeded with under summary procedure, the opposite parties retain the right to cross-examine claimants when the asserted injuries, treatment and expenses are disputed. Summary procedure does not remove the Tribunal's power to test the truth of affidavit evidence through cross-examination. Where claimants were given opportunities to appear, including after a later request was allowed, but still failed to remain present, the Tribunal could treat the pleaded facts as unproved. On that basis, the claims were dismissed, and no interference was warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199450