<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 751 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199445</link>
    <description>A Central Excise appeal in Commissioner v. VI John Beauty Tech was dismissed by the Supreme Court. The text provides no substantive reasoning or legal principle beyond the dismissal, so no further issue-based summary can be drawn from the material supplied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 751 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199445</link>
      <description>A Central Excise appeal in Commissioner v. VI John Beauty Tech was dismissed by the Supreme Court. The text provides no substantive reasoning or legal principle beyond the dismissal, so no further issue-based summary can be drawn from the material supplied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>