https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199443 An interlocutory order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal in proceedings under Section 19 is appealable under the Act if it affects rights or liabilities. Where such an adequate and efficacious statutory appeal exists, supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 should not be used to bypass the appellate framework. A writ petition challenging the Tribunal's refusal to stay proceedings was therefore not maintainable, because the proper course was to pursue the statutory remedy before the Appellate Tribunal. en-us Mon, 28 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:30:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199443 An interlocutory order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal in proceedings under Section 19 is appealable under the Act if it affects rights or liabilities. Where such an adequate and efficacious statutory appeal exists, supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 should not be used to bypass the appellate framework. A writ petition challenging the Tribunal's refusal to stay proceedings was therefore not maintainable, because the proper course was to pursue the statutory remedy before the Appellate Tribunal. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 28 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199443