https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199438 A preventive detention order may be challenged under Article 226 before the detenu surrenders or is finally detained when the order has already been made and poses an imminent threat to personal liberty. The remedy is not confined to post-detention habeas corpus where Article 21 rights are immediately at risk. Continued validity of such an order also depends on strict compliance with statutory safeguards: timely Government approval, where required, and mandatory placement of the case before the Advisory Board within the prescribed period. Non-compliance with these conditions causes the detention order to cease to operate and makes it liable to be quashed. en-us Thu, 09 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Feb 2018 16:22:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199438 A preventive detention order may be challenged under Article 226 before the detenu surrenders or is finally detained when the order has already been made and poses an imminent threat to personal liberty. The remedy is not confined to post-detention habeas corpus where Article 21 rights are immediately at risk. Continued validity of such an order also depends on strict compliance with statutory safeguards: timely Government approval, where required, and mandatory placement of the case before the Advisory Board within the prescribed period. Non-compliance with these conditions causes the detention order to cease to operate and makes it liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199438