<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 604 - COMPANY LAW BOARD ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199433</link>
    <description>The court found substantial evidence of oppression and mismanagement in both SMHPL and ACECPL. It ordered the rectification of shareholding and board representation in SMHPL and directed the division of assets to resolve the disputes. In ACECPL, the court ordered the petitioners to transfer their shares to the respondents to bring an end to the oppressive conduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 16:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 604 - COMPANY LAW BOARD ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199433</link>
      <description>The court found substantial evidence of oppression and mismanagement in both SMHPL and ACECPL. It ordered the rectification of shareholding and board representation in SMHPL and directed the division of assets to resolve the disputes. In ACECPL, the court ordered the petitioners to transfer their shares to the respondents to bring an end to the oppressive conduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>