https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199421 Appellate interference under Section 10F is confined to errors of law and does not extend to mere reappreciation of factual findings. The High Court noted that the complaints regarding dealings with a separate company, loans and advances, gas cylinder purchases, alleged statutory breaches, and refusal of investigation were examined on the record and were either disclosed in accounts, non-prejudicial, or unsupported by particulars. On that basis, the material did not establish oppression or mismanagement, and no factual foundation existed for ordering an investigation. The CLB's reasoned findings were therefore left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 16 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:43:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199421 Appellate interference under Section 10F is confined to errors of law and does not extend to mere reappreciation of factual findings. The High Court noted that the complaints regarding dealings with a separate company, loans and advances, gas cylinder purchases, alleged statutory breaches, and refusal of investigation were examined on the record and were either disclosed in accounts, non-prejudicial, or unsupported by particulars. On that basis, the material did not establish oppression or mismanagement, and no factual foundation existed for ordering an investigation. The CLB's reasoned findings were therefore left undisturbed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 16 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199421