<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 987 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199417</link>
    <description>Delay in filing a suit for specific performance does not justify only where the claim is within limitation and no intervening third-party rights or inequitable consequences are shown; the Court found no such bar here. Readiness and willingness under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 must be gathered from the plaint as a whole and the party&#039;s conduct, and the pleadings and evidence were held sufficient. An alternative prayer for damages does not defeat a substantive claim for specific performance, as Section 21 permits such relief; the High Court&#039;s refusal was set aside and the decree for specific performance was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 987 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199417</link>
      <description>Delay in filing a suit for specific performance does not justify only where the claim is within limitation and no intervening third-party rights or inequitable consequences are shown; the Court found no such bar here. Readiness and willingness under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 must be gathered from the plaint as a whole and the party&#039;s conduct, and the pleadings and evidence were held sufficient. An alternative prayer for damages does not defeat a substantive claim for specific performance, as Section 21 permits such relief; the High Court&#039;s refusal was set aside and the decree for specific performance was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>