<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1211 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199410</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal by way of remand in a case where the stay petition was dismissed for non-compliance of pre-deposit by the first Appellate Authority. The Tribunal found that the issue was identical to a previous appeal where unconditional stay was granted to the same assessee. It was deemed that the dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance was incorrect. The Tribunal ordered the matter to be reconsidered on merits without insisting on any pre-deposit, directing the first Appellate Authority to dispose of the appeal without being influenced by the Tribunal&#039;s previous findings in the stay order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 09:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1211 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199410</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal by way of remand in a case where the stay petition was dismissed for non-compliance of pre-deposit by the first Appellate Authority. The Tribunal found that the issue was identical to a previous appeal where unconditional stay was granted to the same assessee. It was deemed that the dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance was incorrect. The Tribunal ordered the matter to be reconsidered on merits without insisting on any pre-deposit, directing the first Appellate Authority to dispose of the appeal without being influenced by the Tribunal&#039;s previous findings in the stay order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>