<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1716 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356295</link>
    <description>The Court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s adjustment under Section 143(1)(a) disallowing the claim for bad debts was improper as the issue was debatable, relying on a judicial decision. The Court emphasized that the assessee should have been given an opportunity to establish their claim. The judgment favored the assessee, ruling against the Revenue, and the reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1716 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356295</link>
      <description>The Court held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s adjustment under Section 143(1)(a) disallowing the claim for bad debts was improper as the issue was debatable, relying on a judicial decision. The Court emphasized that the assessee should have been given an opportunity to establish their claim. The judgment favored the assessee, ruling against the Revenue, and the reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>