https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356294 The Court upheld the rejection of the petition under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of following the prescribed appeal process and the limitations of the revision remedy. The petitioners' ignorance of the law was not accepted as an excuse, as they timely filed revision petitions within a year of the assessment order. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the impugned order and dismissed the writ petitions for lack of merit. en-us Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Aug 2018 14:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356294 The Court upheld the rejection of the petition under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of following the prescribed appeal process and the limitations of the revision remedy. The petitioners' ignorance of the law was not accepted as an excuse, as they timely filed revision petitions within a year of the assessment order. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the impugned order and dismissed the writ petitions for lack of merit. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356294