<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1714 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356293</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Revenue regarding disputed project receipts and retention money being subjected to tax. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow prior years&#039; expenditure as deduction in the Assessment Year based on the completed contract method of accounting, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bilahari Investment P. Ltd. The appeal was dismissed without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 09:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1714 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356293</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Revenue regarding disputed project receipts and retention money being subjected to tax. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow prior years&#039; expenditure as deduction in the Assessment Year based on the completed contract method of accounting, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bilahari Investment P. Ltd. The appeal was dismissed without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>