<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1705 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356284</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to reassess the income based on a reasonable GP rate derived from the assessee&#039;s past history. The Tribunal emphasized that a trading addition is not necessary if the declared GP rate is higher than the benchmark. The procedural lapse in dismissing the appeal for non-appearance was acknowledged, and the matter was set aside for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 06:31:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1705 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356284</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to reassess the income based on a reasonable GP rate derived from the assessee&#039;s past history. The Tribunal emphasized that a trading addition is not necessary if the declared GP rate is higher than the benchmark. The procedural lapse in dismissing the appeal for non-appearance was acknowledged, and the matter was set aside for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>