<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1686 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356265</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act. It was found that there was no evidence of connivance or collusion by the appellant in misdeclaration or misuse of exemptions. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of establishing specific circumstances to support penalties under the Customs Act, leading to the decision to overturn the penalty in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1686 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356265</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act. It was found that there was no evidence of connivance or collusion by the appellant in misdeclaration or misuse of exemptions. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of establishing specific circumstances to support penalties under the Customs Act, leading to the decision to overturn the penalty in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>