<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1684 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356263</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) affirmed the National Company Law Tribunal&#039;s (NCLT) decision to require meetings of shareholders and unsecured creditors in a scheme of amalgamation, emphasizing the importance of stakeholder communication and corporate governance. The NCLAT upheld the NCLT&#039;s discretion in calling meetings, stating that adherence to the prescribed procedures under the Companies Act, 2013, was necessary. The appeal challenging the NCLT&#039;s decision was dismissed, highlighting the significance of following the statutory process in merger cases and granting the appellant the liberty to approach the NCLT for adjustments to specified schedules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1684 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356263</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) affirmed the National Company Law Tribunal&#039;s (NCLT) decision to require meetings of shareholders and unsecured creditors in a scheme of amalgamation, emphasizing the importance of stakeholder communication and corporate governance. The NCLAT upheld the NCLT&#039;s discretion in calling meetings, stating that adherence to the prescribed procedures under the Companies Act, 2013, was necessary. The appeal challenging the NCLT&#039;s decision was dismissed, highlighting the significance of following the statutory process in merger cases and granting the appellant the liberty to approach the NCLT for adjustments to specified schedules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>