https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356259 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants on the limitation issue, setting aside the order concerning penalties and extended period demands. However, the Tribunal upheld the tax liability under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS), rejecting the appellants' argument of providing Business Support Service (BSS) due to their marketing activities for the bank's financial products as per the agreement. en-us Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Sep 2022 13:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356259 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants on the limitation issue, setting aside the order concerning penalties and extended period demands. However, the Tribunal upheld the tax liability under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS), rejecting the appellants' argument of providing Business Support Service (BSS) due to their marketing activities for the bank's financial products as per the agreement. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356259