https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356255 The Tribunal modified the order, upholding the duty payment of Rs. 4,05,807 but setting aside the penalty imposed on the appellant, a service provider, for not discharging duty on used capital goods cleared as scrap during the period 2009-2010 to 2013-2014. The appellant's status as a PSU and the changes in the law were considered in deeming the penalty unjustified. The appeal was partly allowed based on these considerations. en-us Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Feb 2018 06:29:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356255 The Tribunal modified the order, upholding the duty payment of Rs. 4,05,807 but setting aside the penalty imposed on the appellant, a service provider, for not discharging duty on used capital goods cleared as scrap during the period 2009-2010 to 2013-2014. The appellant's status as a PSU and the changes in the law were considered in deeming the penalty unjustified. The appeal was partly allowed based on these considerations. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356255