https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356253 Delay in filing the appeal was condonable because the appellants had bona fide pursued a writ remedy on legal advice, and there was no material showing mala fides, gross negligence, utter callousness or dilatory tactics. The period spent in prosecuting that writ petition was therefore rightly excluded for limitation purposes. The order refusing condonation was set aside, subject to costs, and the appeal was restored for decision on merits. en-us Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jun 2018 16:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356253 Delay in filing the appeal was condonable because the appellants had bona fide pursued a writ remedy on legal advice, and there was no material showing mala fides, gross negligence, utter callousness or dilatory tactics. The period spent in prosecuting that writ petition was therefore rightly excluded for limitation purposes. The order refusing condonation was set aside, subject to costs, and the appeal was restored for decision on merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356253