<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1665 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356244</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the order alleging clandestine manufacture and clearance of ceramic tiles due to insufficient concrete evidence beyond theoretical calculations and unverified statements. Emphasizing the necessity of corroborative evidence, the tribunal allowed the appeals, highlighting the lack of substantial proof to support the allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 06:28:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1665 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356244</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the order alleging clandestine manufacture and clearance of ceramic tiles due to insufficient concrete evidence beyond theoretical calculations and unverified statements. Emphasizing the necessity of corroborative evidence, the tribunal allowed the appeals, highlighting the lack of substantial proof to support the allegations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>