<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1661 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356240</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing adherence to the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 and legal requirements for claiming CENVAT credit on inputs used in manufacturing processes. The denial of credit solely based on excess input usage was deemed inconsistent with the law, leading to the appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1661 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356240</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing adherence to the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 and legal requirements for claiming CENVAT credit on inputs used in manufacturing processes. The denial of credit solely based on excess input usage was deemed inconsistent with the law, leading to the appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>