<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1659 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356238</link>
    <description>The Tribunal decided to close the files of long-pending appeals that had been stayed by the High Court, pending resolution of a writ petition since 2016. The closure was for statistical purposes only, with appeals remaining active. Recognizing the need to clear old cases before transitioning to the GST regime, the Tribunal aimed to streamline its workload. Parties were allowed to apply for reopening once the High Court resolves the matter or if circumstances change significantly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1659 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356238</link>
      <description>The Tribunal decided to close the files of long-pending appeals that had been stayed by the High Court, pending resolution of a writ petition since 2016. The closure was for statistical purposes only, with appeals remaining active. Recognizing the need to clear old cases before transitioning to the GST regime, the Tribunal aimed to streamline its workload. Parties were allowed to apply for reopening once the High Court resolves the matter or if circumstances change significantly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>