<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1281 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199405</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the restoration application filed by the Revenue concerning the appeal that was summarily dismissed under Section 86 of the Finance Act 1994. The main issue was the classification of the taxable service provided by the respondent, with the Revenue arguing for &#039;Management or Maintenance or Repair Service&#039; classification and the respondent advocating for &#039;Works Contract Service.&#039; The Tribunal found that the appeal dismissal was based on the Litigation Policy due to the service tax amount being below the threshold and that such dismissals do not establish precedents. The restoration application was ultimately denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 20:20:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1281 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199405</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the restoration application filed by the Revenue concerning the appeal that was summarily dismissed under Section 86 of the Finance Act 1994. The main issue was the classification of the taxable service provided by the respondent, with the Revenue arguing for &#039;Management or Maintenance or Repair Service&#039; classification and the respondent advocating for &#039;Works Contract Service.&#039; The Tribunal found that the appeal dismissal was based on the Litigation Policy due to the service tax amount being below the threshold and that such dismissals do not establish precedents. The restoration application was ultimately denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>