<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 896 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199403</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that private respondents who participated in a selection process cannot later challenge it, invoking the doctrine of waiver. The Court emphasized the principle that participation with knowledge of the process precludes subsequent challenges. The Court set aside the High Court and Single Judge&#039;s orders, dismissing the writ petition filed by private respondents. The parties were directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 896 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199403</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that private respondents who participated in a selection process cannot later challenge it, invoking the doctrine of waiver. The Court emphasized the principle that participation with knowledge of the process precludes subsequent challenges. The Court set aside the High Court and Single Judge&#039;s orders, dismissing the writ petition filed by private respondents. The parties were directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>