<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1173 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199401</link>
    <description>Direct recruitment to the post required basic computer operation knowledge, and the advertisement, notifications and interview call letter consistently repeated that condition, including testing of Microsoft Operating System and Microsoft Office skills at interview. Because the candidate participated with full knowledge and raised no protest, the requirement was not a new benchmark introduced mid-process. The computer-knowledge assessment, conducted with expert assistance, was also held neither arbitrary nor unreasonable. The challenge to the selection process therefore failed, and the non-selection was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1173 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199401</link>
      <description>Direct recruitment to the post required basic computer operation knowledge, and the advertisement, notifications and interview call letter consistently repeated that condition, including testing of Microsoft Operating System and Microsoft Office skills at interview. Because the candidate participated with full knowledge and raised no protest, the requirement was not a new benchmark introduced mid-process. The computer-knowledge assessment, conducted with expert assistance, was also held neither arbitrary nor unreasonable. The challenge to the selection process therefore failed, and the non-selection was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>