https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199395 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff regarding copyright infringement due to substantial similarities in floral designs and color schemes of the pencils. However, the court found no trademark infringement between "Camlin Flora" and "Tiger Flore." A partial interim injunction was granted to protect the plaintiff's unique pencil features until the case's final resolution. en-us Fri, 13 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:17:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199395 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff regarding copyright infringement due to substantial similarities in floral designs and color schemes of the pencils. However, the court found no trademark infringement between "Camlin Flora" and "Tiger Flore." A partial interim injunction was granted to protect the plaintiff's unique pencil features until the case's final resolution. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 13 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199395