<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1923 (12) TMI 2 - BEFORE THE PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199392</link>
    <description>Copyright in a compilation requires original intellectual labour in the selection, expression or arrangement of material, not mere reproduction of common source passages. On the facts, the selected text was treated as a reprint of passages from a prior work and lacked sufficient originality, so protection for the text was not established. By contrast, separately prepared notes and glossary can be original literary works where they reflect real selection, condensation, judgment and skill and add substantial value. The notes here were found to meet that standard, and serial copying of them showed infringement. Copyright therefore subsisted in the notes and glossary, but not in the text itself.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 1923 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:56:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1923 (12) TMI 2 - BEFORE THE PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199392</link>
      <description>Copyright in a compilation requires original intellectual labour in the selection, expression or arrangement of material, not mere reproduction of common source passages. On the facts, the selected text was treated as a reprint of passages from a prior work and lacked sufficient originality, so protection for the text was not established. By contrast, separately prepared notes and glossary can be original literary works where they reflect real selection, condensation, judgment and skill and add substantial value. The notes here were found to meet that standard, and serial copying of them showed infringement. Copyright therefore subsisted in the notes and glossary, but not in the text itself.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 1923 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>