<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 58 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12060</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying the commission agent&#039;s claim for deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The agent&#039;s activities assisting foreign principals in procuring goods from Indian suppliers and providing market information within India did not qualify for the deduction. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to allow deduction only for travel expenses, rejecting other claims as the services provided did not meet the criteria for deduction under section 35B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 58 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12060</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying the commission agent&#039;s claim for deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The agent&#039;s activities assisting foreign principals in procuring goods from Indian suppliers and providing market information within India did not qualify for the deduction. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to allow deduction only for travel expenses, rejecting other claims as the services provided did not meet the criteria for deduction under section 35B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>