<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 814 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199377</link>
    <description>Broadly drafted arbitration clauses in partnership deeds may extend to disputes over dissolution of the firm, validity of a modification deed, and allegations of fraud or misrepresentation. The text notes that questions on the scope of the arbitration agreement and the arbitrator&#039;s jurisdiction are ordinarily for the arbitral tribunal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, rather than for the court at the appointment stage. It also states that an arbitration clause entered into under the Arbitration Act, 1940 does not prevent appointment under Section 11 of the 1996 Act where the dispute is invoked after its commencement, as the earlier regime stood repealed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:28:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 814 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199377</link>
      <description>Broadly drafted arbitration clauses in partnership deeds may extend to disputes over dissolution of the firm, validity of a modification deed, and allegations of fraud or misrepresentation. The text notes that questions on the scope of the arbitration agreement and the arbitrator&#039;s jurisdiction are ordinarily for the arbitral tribunal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, rather than for the court at the appointment stage. It also states that an arbitration clause entered into under the Arbitration Act, 1940 does not prevent appointment under Section 11 of the 1996 Act where the dispute is invoked after its commencement, as the earlier regime stood repealed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>