<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 626 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199373</link>
    <description>An election petition seeking inspection or recount of ballot papers must plead material facts with sufficient precision and establish a prima facie case supported by contemporaneous material. Recount is an exceptional remedy because ballot secrecy is a sacrosanct electoral principle, and it cannot be ordered on vague, generalized, or unsupported allegations that would permit a roving or fishing inquiry. The petition must disclose the core facts showing where, how, and in what manner the alleged irregularities occurred; evidence cannot cure pleadings that are too general. On these principles, the allegations were found insufficient and the direction for recount was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 626 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199373</link>
      <description>An election petition seeking inspection or recount of ballot papers must plead material facts with sufficient precision and establish a prima facie case supported by contemporaneous material. Recount is an exceptional remedy because ballot secrecy is a sacrosanct electoral principle, and it cannot be ordered on vague, generalized, or unsupported allegations that would permit a roving or fishing inquiry. The petition must disclose the core facts showing where, how, and in what manner the alleged irregularities occurred; evidence cannot cure pleadings that are too general. On these principles, the allegations were found insufficient and the direction for recount was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>