https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199369 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and dismissed the writ petitions challenging the amendment of regulations by three banks, which restricted officers from seeking assistance in disciplinary proceedings. The Court held that the amendment was just, reasonable, and in the public interest, rejecting claims of discrimination. It emphasized the importance of expeditious disciplinary proceedings and fair access to defense assistance, concluding that the amendment did not violate Article 14 of the Constitution of India. en-us Thu, 04 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Feb 2018 11:58:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199369 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and dismissed the writ petitions challenging the amendment of regulations by three banks, which restricted officers from seeking assistance in disciplinary proceedings. The Court held that the amendment was just, reasonable, and in the public interest, rejecting claims of discrimination. It emphasized the importance of expeditious disciplinary proceedings and fair access to defense assistance, concluding that the amendment did not violate Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199369