<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 1125 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199365</link>
    <description>Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure permits judgment where there is a plain and unequivocal admission entitling the other side to succeed. An admission need not be confined to the formal pleadings if it is placed before the court and the opposite party has an opportunity to explain it. On the facts, the board resolution, meeting minutes and accompanying letter, read with the pleadings, constituted a clear admission of liability; the affidavit denial was treated as evasive. The only dispute related to the extent of the admitted sum, not the existence of liability, and the decree on the admitted claim was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 1125 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199365</link>
      <description>Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure permits judgment where there is a plain and unequivocal admission entitling the other side to succeed. An admission need not be confined to the formal pleadings if it is placed before the court and the opposite party has an opportunity to explain it. On the facts, the board resolution, meeting minutes and accompanying letter, read with the pleadings, constituted a clear admission of liability; the affidavit denial was treated as evasive. The only dispute related to the extent of the admitted sum, not the existence of liability, and the decree on the admitted claim was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>