https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199362 An industrial award binding under Section 18(3)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 extends to the workmen covered by the establishment, including those in the relevant class of employees, even if not individually impleaded. Because the award arose from a dispute of general application and the unions were heard, its binding force could not be denied on that ground. Where implementation of the award left the bank with no real discretion and the legal position was not genuinely in dispute, a prior hearing before issuing the recovery and remuneration revision notice was unnecessary, as natural justice would then be an empty formality. en-us Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199362 An industrial award binding under Section 18(3)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 extends to the workmen covered by the establishment, including those in the relevant class of employees, even if not individually impleaded. Because the award arose from a dispute of general application and the unions were heard, its binding force could not be denied on that ground. Where implementation of the award left the bank with no real discretion and the legal position was not genuinely in dispute, a prior hearing before issuing the recovery and remuneration revision notice was unnecessary, as natural justice would then be an empty formality. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199362