<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1649 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356228</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition for STT and service tax, citing lack of basis for disallowance. The Court also admitted the Appeal on characterizing the transaction as Short Term Capital Gain for further review, directing the Tribunal to provide related records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 07:13:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1649 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356228</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition for STT and service tax, citing lack of basis for disallowance. The Court also admitted the Appeal on characterizing the transaction as Short Term Capital Gain for further review, directing the Tribunal to provide related records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>