<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1645 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356224</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant company in a case involving the addition of unconfirmed credit balances to the returned income and the disallowance of a deduction claimed under section 80-IC of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal determined that the additions were unjustified as the purchases were supported by documentation, verified by authorities, and the company&#039;s trading results were accepted. The CIT (A)&#039;s decision to confirm the addition based on the failure to prove the genuineness of sundry creditors was overturned, and the addition was deleted. The company&#039;s appeal was allowed, resulting in the removal of the addition to the returned income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 07:12:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1645 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356224</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant company in a case involving the addition of unconfirmed credit balances to the returned income and the disallowance of a deduction claimed under section 80-IC of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal determined that the additions were unjustified as the purchases were supported by documentation, verified by authorities, and the company&#039;s trading results were accepted. The CIT (A)&#039;s decision to confirm the addition based on the failure to prove the genuineness of sundry creditors was overturned, and the addition was deleted. The company&#039;s appeal was allowed, resulting in the removal of the addition to the returned income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>