<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1638 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356217</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer invalid due to a vague notice under section 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) without specifying the exact charge. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the penalty proceedings and deleted the penalty levied by the AO, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 07:12:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1638 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356217</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer invalid due to a vague notice under section 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) without specifying the exact charge. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the penalty proceedings and deleted the penalty levied by the AO, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>