<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1634 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356213</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, reversing disallowances by the AO and CIT(A). It held that interest paid for acquiring the capital asset should be included in the cost of acquisition. Additionally, expenses to make the new flat habitable were allowed as part of the cost of improvement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 07:12:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1634 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356213</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, reversing disallowances by the AO and CIT(A). It held that interest paid for acquiring the capital asset should be included in the cost of acquisition. Additionally, expenses to make the new flat habitable were allowed as part of the cost of improvement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>