<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1629 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356208</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for assessment years 2005-06, 2007-08, and 2011-12, directing the deletion of disallowances made under section 14A. It was held that additions under section 153A must be supported by search findings, and disallowances cannot exceed exempt income. The Tribunal emphasized the need to adhere to the scope of assessment under section 153A and follow legal precedents like CIT vs. Kabul Chawla and Joint Investment Pvt. Ltd. to determine disallowances accurately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1629 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356208</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for assessment years 2005-06, 2007-08, and 2011-12, directing the deletion of disallowances made under section 14A. It was held that additions under section 153A must be supported by search findings, and disallowances cannot exceed exempt income. The Tribunal emphasized the need to adhere to the scope of assessment under section 153A and follow legal precedents like CIT vs. Kabul Chawla and Joint Investment Pvt. Ltd. to determine disallowances accurately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>